Most agency searches start with the wrong question
When a brand team decides the brand needs help, the conversation usually starts the same way: We need to hire a creative agency, media agency, or a digital marketing agency. The problem is those are solutions dressed up as problems, and they get picked before anyone has agreed on what’s broken. To do that, the brand team needs to ask: What business outcome are we trying to create, and what combination of expertise gets us there?
Declining sales might not be a media problem. Weak acquisition could be about positioning, the customer experience or where people drop off before they convert, or maybe all three. A problem in retail growth might have to do with creative, shopper marketing, commerce, data, and media—all in the same quarter.
A true brand transformation usually requires organizational change, different creative, a reconstituted digital presence, and a whole other customer experience. And good luck doing all that with four agencies that have never spoken to each other.
Yet, most brands still shop for a marketing agency by category, not by the business outcomes they need to achieve. You have to diagnose the problem before prescribing the remedy. Most of the industry has that backwards and has for a long time.
The Marketing Industry Was Built Around Silos—Business Isn’t
Why does the industry look the way it does? None of it happened by accident. For decades, agencies organized themselves around disciplines and holding companies built portfolios from those disciplines. From an operating standpoint it might have made sense, as that’s how you scale, specialize, and protect your margins. But from the client’s perspective, the arrangement tends to look like this:
• Different agendas by agency
• Multiple contracts; multiple P&Ls
• Overlapping strategies
• Recommendations that often contradict each other
• Data that doesn’t match up across teams
• Slow handoffs
Eventually the question becomes: Who is accountable here?
We’re seeing fragmentation worsen as brands try to bring AI and data into creative, commerce, and media at once. You can’t build a connected intelligence layer on top of teams that were never connected to begin with.
The point isn’t “integrated good, specialists bad.” Specialists are indispensable. After all, you want the best people according to their discipline running those various disciplines.
Specialization is not the problem—it’s fragmentation. Too often those get treated as the same thing, but they’re not even close.
A Marketing Partner Starts with the Business Problem, Not Its Own Capabilities
This is probably the part I care about most.
An agency’s instinct is to ask, right out of the gate, “How can our agency help?” Again, that’s the wrong question. It’s about what the agency sells, not about what the client needs. How about this instead: “What needs to happen for this business to win and what is the best group of people to make it happen?”
Sometimes the answer is brand strategy. Sometimes it’s creative, performance marketing, traditional media, commerce, experiential, technology, data, or AI. Usually, it’s some combination, and the mix will continue to change as the business does.